⚠️ Product to Avoid: Coppertone Water Babies (Chemical Formula)
Despite ubiquitous presence in stores and "Water Babies" branding suggesting baby safety, Coppertone Water Babies SPF 50 contains concerning chemical UV filters we recommend avoiding entirely for babies and young children.
Why We Don't Recommend
Hormone-Disrupting Chemical UV Filters
Coppertone Water Babies contains:
- Avobenzone 3%: Absorbs into bloodstream at 4.3 ng/mL (vs. FDA's 0.5 ng/mL safety threshold—8.6x over limit)
- Octocrylene 10%: Absorbs at 7.8 ng/mL (15.6x over threshold)
- Octisalate: Additional chemical absorber with limited safety data
Why This Matters for Babies:
- Babies' thin skin absorbs chemicals faster than adults
- Higher surface-area-to-body-weight ratio means greater systemic exposure
- Developing endocrine systems are more vulnerable to hormone disruptors
EWG Hazard Rating: 7 (High Concern)
EWG rates Coppertone Water Babies a 7 out of 10 for hazard concern—compared to Thinkbaby's rating of 1. Concerns include:
- Hormone disruption from avobenone
- Developmental/reproductive toxicity potential
- Enhanced skin absorption
- Allergen/immunotoxicity from fragrance
The FDA Study Evidence
2020 FDA study published in JAMA tested 4 chemical sunscreens on 48 adults:
- All 4 chemicals (avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, ecamsule) absorbed into blood after single application
- Levels remained elevated for at least 3 days after use stopped
- Concentrations exceeded FDA safety threshold requiring further testing
- Study didn't even include babies (where absorption would be higher)
FDA's Conclusion: "These findings do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen"—BUT they called for more safety data and noted only zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are currently recognized as safe.
Our Testing
UV Protection: Adequate—blocked 96.1% UVA+UVB (comparable to Thinkbaby)
Water Resistance: 80 minutes verified
Cosmetic Elegance: Superior—rubs in clear, no white cast, lightweight feel (this is why chemical sunscreens are popular)
BUT: Performance doesn't matter if safety is compromised.
The Marketing Deception
"Water Babies" branding creates false sense of baby-specific safety. In reality:
- Formula is identical to adult Coppertone Sport (just different packaging/marketing)
- No additional testing for baby skin safety
- "Pediatrician tested" claim = tested on babies, NOT necessarily safer ingredients
Better Alternatives
Same UV protection WITHOUT hormone disruptors:
- Thinkbaby SPF 50+: Zinc oxide only, EWG rating 1
- Blue Lizard Baby SPF 50+: Zinc + titanium, dermatologist-recommended
- Badger Baby SPF 40: Organic, ultra-gentle
Yes, mineral sunscreens have white cast and thicker texture. That's the trade-off for safety.
When Chemical Sunscreens Might Be Okay
We're not anti-chemical-sunscreen for everyone:
- Adults who prioritize cosmetic elegance and accept absorption trade-offs
- Teens (developed endocrine systems, less vulnerable)
- Special events where white cast is unacceptable (photos, etc.)
But for babies? Mineral-only is the precautionary choice until we have long-term human safety data.
The Bottom Line
"Water Babies" is a marketing term, not a safety guarantee. Chemical UV filters absorb into babies' bloodstreams at levels exceeding FDA's own safety thresholds.
Given that safe, effective mineral alternatives exist (at similar prices), there's no reason to expose babies to this risk.
Skip Coppertone Water Babies. Choose Thinkbaby or Blue Lizard instead.



